i hate cable TV.
it’s some sort of racket, with monopolies and the worst customer service available…
i LOVE Hulu. i hear that they may be adding another ‘free’ internet TV network to the mix, which would make it even more silly to be paying for TV…
Netflix is my other best friend now. it will help me purchase fewer DVDs that i ultimately don’t watch twice anyway, it streams instant viewing to the ol’ xbox, and my wife and i can get the movies we’ve wanted to see whenever we want.
one of the things i just found on Netflix Instant View – the Power of Myth miniseries, featuring interviews with Joseph Campbell.
i decided that i’m gonna watch this all the way through before i jump back into Thou Art That, but i have an unfortunately small amount of time to watch/read at this point in the year… so here are my thoughts from the first episode! I’ll let this set a better context for continuing to talk about ‘myth’ in Campbell’s terms…
this miniseries was recorded at Skywalker Ranch… which is not a coincidence, but rather in indicator of how closely tied the work of Campbell is with the work of Lucas in developing the Star Wars story arc.
as Campbell takes some introductory time talking about all of the many ways that he has studied mythology from so many different cultures, he then jumps pretty quickly into the concept of the Hero’s Journey, the crux of his work in The Hero with a Thousand Faces.
Campbell says that the hero’s journey is “one deed done by many, many people.” This is an interesting statement, because it illustrates Campbell’s worldview – a framework in which all of the world’s cultures are ultimately tied together in ‘spiritual’ ways. Campbell is quite postmodern as a result of his intensely diverse, globalized work that is then intentionally unified. It’s a little muddy when he starts talking about one culture but then ‘effortlessly’ slips into talking about another culture’s myth.
my friend mike noticed this in another of Campbell’s written works, and asked me, “so where’s the line? what is myth and what really happened?” notice how, in the case of talking about Campbell’s work, asking if it is “true” is not the point…
Campbell says that the hero is “giving to something bigger, other than himself.” this is a recurring theme in Campbell’s work, and arguably in all mythology – the hero is journeying toward an ‘other’ that is much broader and universe-defining.
Campbell makes the distinction between the physical “deed” and the spiritual “deed” accomplished by the hero on their journey. Physical deeds are epitomized by Hercules’ tasks… or, Luke creating a new lightsaber. Spiritual deeds are deeper, more transformative, though… Campbell calls them a “mode of experience.’ I infer that spiritual deeds are what the Buddha accomplishes, what Jesus’ resurrection constitutes (to Campbell), and what Muhammed encounters (and maybe Joseph Smith, too). This probably also extends to Luke’s time with Yoda. These spiritual deeds, when completed, have been a mode of experience and they transform the hero’s mode of experiencing from thereafter. For me, a Christian’s conversion experience is probably the best true picture of this spiritual deed, although the Christian is arguably the recipient of the deed rather than the doer… but the mode of experience is certainly transformed… or should be.
Campbell points out the death/resurrection “motif” in the hero’s journey. For him, this motif is found ubiquitously, and thus it seems that Jesus’ experience is relegated to a similar plane as that of Krishna, Bacchus, Osiris, and a few other mythological entities. That is pretty unfortunate, in my opinion, because Jesus is an arguably historical person (to Campbell), whereas the other three ‘gods’ are clearly not historical in any sense.
However, it is fair for Campbell to point out this ‘motif’ in myth. The question for me is, where is this motif rooted? what is the most true expression of this motif? Campbell doesn’t really get into that during this episode…
Campbell includes some aspects of psychotherapy when pointing out that the “water is the unconscious” in myth. Anytime that water plays a large role in a story, it is a metaphor for the unconscious. this applies directly to the Jonah story, but i wonder how it would play out in Campbell’s interpretation of Jesus calming the sea…
He then points out that “the animal is the dynamism of the unconscious,” revealing another aspect of his worldview. Humanity = elevated animal. The driving forces of our unconscious, because they are similar to responses and reactions of animals, MUST mean that we are at root, animals. at least, that’s how this kind of talk comes across to me, and it seems to be another potential weakness in Campbell’s worldview.
Here’s how he then unpacks this animal-consciousness issue. Campbell explains that consciousness is a secondary “organ” of the human being… it is an organ in the sense that it must ‘serve’ the body. if one’s consciousness is not serving the body, then it is not functioning correctly… he uses the illustration of heliotropism, referring to it as a form of consciousness. not sure what to make of that. hope this is explained more in the next episode.
Campbell uses the terms “spiritual, heart life,” but he doesn’t really clarify what that means in his worldview.
Just wanted to offer this for thought, comments, etc. i’ll hopefully catch the next episode this week or next, and will post as soon as time allows.